CSM2_Amer: OK
CSM2_Baiocchi: Pressioni ora sembrano corrette. Permangono problemi con E
CSM2_Contel: OK
CSM2_Desantis: OK
CSM2_Firmani: OK
CSM2_Mustacchi: I valori ora sono corretti. Permane il problma della 
g(r): asintoticamente non va ad 1 (e nel grafico va riportata solo fino 
a r = L/2). 
CSM2_Santoro: tauV ora sembra corretto.
CSM2_Scarpati: Pressioni ora sembrano corrette. Permangono problemi con E


Non ancora pervenute o perse (in questo caso inviare di nuovo) 

Vecchi commenti:

CSM2_Bertini: everything is OK, except the plot of g(r) which is plotted
   versus r/L (in spite of the labels). Many of the interesting features
   cannot be seen (the position of the first maximum should be essentially
   the same for the three different values of L). 
   Correggere e RISOTTOMETTERE.

CSM2_LagosJavier: 
in a) taup is incorrect, as well as the value of the energy
in b) again the energy is not OK; in c) the results for the g(r) is 
only valid up to r = L/2. The comment "The pair distribution function has
several peaks due to the minima present in the potential" is not correct. 
The peaks signal that there is short-range order, that is that there 
are preferred distances in the system (this is the typical behavior for 
a liquid system; in solids, distances are essentially fixed and the 
pair distribution function is characterized by sharp peaks). There is no
direct connection with the position of the minima in the potential. 
Check and RESUBMIT

CSM2_Poggialini: Includere la tail correction nel confronto al punto c). Senza
il confronto non ha molto senso. Rivedere i commenti nella sez. 4 sui Size 
Effects. Resto OK. 
Correggere e RISOTTOMETTERE

CSM2_Saenz:
in a) taup is incorrect, as well as the value of the energy
in b) again the energy is not OK, as well as the energy tail correction.
in c) the results for the g(r) cannot be right. For r/sigma = 1, it 
should be of order 1. I think some prefactor is missing (V_epsilon? )
Check and RESUBMIT